Integrated Health Financing · Uganda

Where the money comes from,
and where it goes.

A single source of truth for projected allocations and actual expenditures across Government, Donors, Partners and Households — mapped to programs, regions and costed strategic plans.

Total resources allocated

—

FY 24/25 · across — reporting organisations

Total expenditure reported

—

— of allocations absorbed

Funding gap vs CSPs

—

Across 8 program costed plans

Allocations this cycle

—

● — recorded · ● — draft

3-year allocation pipeline

Year-on-year totals across all filtered allocations · clicking a bar applies the FY filter

Pipeline total

—

Fund flow · Source → Program

Hover any band to see amount and share

By funding source

Composition of committed resources

Resources by program area

Committed vs expenditure · FY 24/25

Regional distribution

Committed UGX by region · tap for districts

Recent submissions

Live feed from partners and government entities

Alignment Analysis · FY 2024/25 – 2026/27

Are partners projecting where the burden / actually lies?

For each program area, this page compares the regional disease burden against partner projected allocations. The aim is simple: investment should follow need. Where it doesn't, this page surfaces the gap and the rebalancing opportunity.

Select a program area

—

Projected allocations across the next three financial years, by subprogram

Funding partners

Share of total projected allocation

By subprogram

Money in, numbers out

Burden × Investment

Are partners putting money where the burden is?

Rows are regions, columns are subprograms. The red wash shows disease burden; the teal bar shows the share of partner investment flowing to that region. A red dot flags cells where burden outweighs investment.

Burden low → high

Investment share of $ to region

under-invested vs burden

over-invested vs burden

Are we putting money where the burden is?

Diagonal = fair share by burden. Dots below = under-invested.

Indicator

On the line — investment matches burden share

Below — region under-invested for its burden

Above — region over-invested relative to burden

Partner footprint by region

Which partners are present in high-burden regions? Empty cells reveal coverage gaps.

Major presence Minor Absent

—

Investment × Performance map

Each circle is a subprogram. Vertical: trend in indicator. Horizontal: projected 3-yr allocation.

Working Stagnant Reversing

Partner contributions to this program

Click a partner to see their subprogram split.

FY 24/25 — FY 26/27

Partner	Function	FY24/25	FY25/26	FY26/27	3-yr total	Subprogram split

Flow Analysis

Fund flows in motion

Trace each Ugandan shilling from its origin to where it lands. Switch between a flow diagram and a matrix to surface different questions.

Viz

From

To

Total flow · FY 24/25

—

0 sources · 0 destinations

Hover to see amount · %

Geography

Resources across Uganda

146 districts · 4 regions · Click a region to drill into its districts.

Regional breakdown

M1 · Partner Coordination

—

M1 · Partner Coordination

Compliance Dashboard

Every partner across four compliance dimensions — MOU, URSB, Workplan, Expenditure reporting. Filter to find gaps, then act.

Fully compliant

—

All 4 dimensions green

Expiring MOUs

—

Within 90 days

Expired MOUs

—

Action required

Avg. compliance score

—

Across all partners

Filter

— partners

	Partner	Type	MOU	URSB	Workplan	Expenditure	Score

M5 · System Access

System access & gatekeeping

Request and manage access to the ten MoH digital systems. Every request is pre-validated against your MOU and workplan. Access automatically expires when your MOU lapses.

Active grants

—

Pending review

—

Suspended

—

Avg. time to approve

—

Days, last 90d

Filter

— requests

ID	System	Partner	Reason	Submitted	Status	Expires

M6 · Communications

Partner communications

—

Resource Mapping · projected allocation

Record a projected allocation

Report a planned or projected health-related investment across the next three financial years. We reveal fields only as they become relevant.

Progress

0/6

1Where it goes

Entity & vote

2Program

Area & intervention

3Funding

Source & channel

4Amounts

3-year plan

5Beneficiaries

Target & ages

6Review

Submit

Where will this money be spent?

Level

Entity Type

Entity / Vote

For government entities we use the official Vote code; for others we use their name.

What program area does this support?

Program / Project area

Specify intervention

Sub-intervention L1

Sub-intervention L2

Sub-intervention L3

Factor of provision (optional — specifies the line item)

Who is funding it?

Funding source

Funding type

Budget channel

On/off budget relative to the national treasury, on/off plan relative to the national planning documents.

GoU co-funding amount (if any)

Projected allocations by financial year

Indicate planned amounts per FY. These can be adjusted during the cycle.

FY 2024/25

FY 2025/26

FY 2026/27

Total projected allocation · 3 years UGX 0

Who benefits?

Target beneficiaries

Service delivery level

Age groups (multi-select)

HIV-only: specific populations

Review & submit

You can edit this allocation from Resource Mapping any time before the reporting cycle closes on 30 Sept.

Allocations this cycle

Click a row to inspect.

Entity	Program	Source	FY24/25	FY25/26	FY26/27	Status

Expenditure Tracking

Project expenditure records

Track actual spending at project level — recurrent, capital, and factor-of-provision line items.

New expenditure entry

Record project spending

1Project

Name & description

2Recurrent

Compensation · services · goods

3Capital

Infrastructure & assets

4Review

Confirm & save

Project identification

Link to a projected allocation — optional, for absorption tracking

Project / programme name

Description of health component(s)

Reporting period

Source of funds

Projects tracked

—

Total recurrent

—

Total capital

—

Projects

Click any row — detail opens on the right

Costed Strategic Plans

Programme cost ceilings vs mapped resources

Each CSP sets the funding required to deliver its programme. Resource mapping shows how close we got. Edit a cost inline; gap analysis recomputes live.

Total CSP cost

—

Total mapped

—

Net gap

—

Programmes fully funded

—

Programme	FY 24/25	FY 25/26	FY 26/27	Total CSP	Mapped	Gap / surplus	Coverage

Costed Strategic Plan vs Resource Mapping

Where are we under-funded?

Every costed strategic plan sets a ceiling. Resource mapping tells us how close we got. Gaps below are financing requirements; surpluses may indicate duplication or re-programming opportunities.

Total CSP cost

—

Across 8 program plans

Total mapped

—

Net gap

—

Programs fully funded

—

By program

Programs

Health program portfolio

All programmes

Partner overlap & duplication

Programme × region cells where two or more partners are contributing. Indicates coordination opportunities or genuine co-financing.

Ledger

All allocations

Every projected allocation recorded in the portal, across organisations and programs.

ID	Organisation	Program	3-yr total	Submitted	Status

Partner directory

Reporting organisations

Settings

Preferences

Appearance

Light or dark theme

Reset demo data

Restore default seeded dummy data

Export all data

Download current state as JSON

Where the money comes from, and where it goes.